Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. Maud State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. Maud State Bank

1923 OK 79, 212 P. 603, 88 Okla. 197, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 591

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 6, 1923

Docket11008

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 79 (Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. Maud State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. Maud State Bank, 1923 OK 79, 212 P. 603, 88 Okla. 197, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 591 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNAMER, J.

Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, filed this appeal in this court on October 22, 1919, to reverse a judgment rendered in the superior court of Pottawatomie county in favor of the Maud State Bank et al.', defendants in error.

This case was set for submission on the 12th day of December, 1922, and on that date submitted to the court. On the 1st day of November, 1922, the plaintiff in error secured an extension of time of 30 days in which to file brief. On the 28th day of November, 1922, plaintiff in error was granted 60 days’ additional time to file brief.

No brief has been filed nor excuse given why a brief has not been filed. In this situation this court may dismiss the appeal, and it is so ordered.

JOHNSON, V. C. J., and KANE, NICHOLSON. and BRANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KENNAMER, J.

Mid-Continent Life Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, filed this appeal in this court on October 22, 1919, to reverse a judgment rendered in the superior court of Pottawatomie county in favor of the Maud State Bank et al.', defendants in error.

This case was set for submission on the 12th day of December, 1922, and on that date submitted to the court. On the 1st day of November, 1922, the plaintiff in error secured an extension of time of 30 days in which to file brief. On the 28th day of November, 1922, plaintiff in error was granted 60 days’ additional time to file brief.

No brief has been filed nor excuse given why a brief has not been filed. In this situation this court may dismiss the appeal, and it is so ordered.

JOHNSON, V. C. J., and KANE, NICHOLSON. and BRANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 79, 212 P. 603, 88 Okla. 197, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-continent-life-insurance-co-v-maud-state-bank-okla-1923.