Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams - Partial Dissent/Concurrence

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams - Partial Dissent/Concurrence

DecidedJanuary 11, 2005

DocketW2004-00484-COA-R3-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams - Partial Dissent/Concurrence (Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams - Partial Dissent/Concurrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams - Partial Dissent/Concurrence, (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 12, 2004 Session

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, ET AL.

A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 9551 The Honorable Jon K. Blackwood, Judge

No. W2004-00484-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 11, 2005

PARTIAL DISSENT ________________________

I write separately to dissent in part from the majority opinion. I agree with the majority’s analysis of the policy at issue, but disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s finding that the childcare arrangement was not conducted for profit.

I certainly agree that the discrepancies in Ms. Williams’ testimony in her two depositions and her trial testimony “suggest . . . deliberate obfuscation” and, if I were the trial judge, I would feel constrained to hold as the majority does, that Ms. Williams’ later testimony was an effort to avoid the consequences of the exclusions from coverage. I am not, however, the trial judge. Here, the trial court’s credibility determination is not based solely on the deposition testimony, ascertained from the transcript. It is also based on Ms. Williams’ testimony at trial, derived from the trial judge’s observation of her demeanor and manner in the courtroom. Given our standard of review for such a credibility determination, I feel compelled, albeit reluctantly, to affirm the trial court’s finding of fact that the childcare arrangement was not conducted for profit.

On this basis, I dissent in part from the majority opinion. In all other respects, I fully concur.

__________________________________________ HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 12, 2004 Session

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, ET AL.

A Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. 9551 The Honorable Jon K. Blackwood, Judge

No. W2004-00484-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 11, 2005

PARTIAL DISSENT ________________________

I write separately to dissent in part from the majority opinion. I agree with the majority’s analysis of the policy at issue, but disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s finding that the childcare arrangement was not conducted for profit.

I certainly agree that the discrepancies in Ms. Williams’ testimony in her two depositions and her trial testimony “suggest . . . deliberate obfuscation” and, if I were the trial judge, I would feel constrained to hold as the majority does, that Ms. Williams’ later testimony was an effort to avoid the consequences of the exclusions from coverage. I am not, however, the trial judge. Here, the trial court’s credibility determination is not based solely on the deposition testimony, ascertained from the transcript. It is also based on Ms. Williams’ testimony at trial, derived from the trial judge’s observation of her demeanor and manner in the courtroom. Given our standard of review for such a credibility determination, I feel compelled, albeit reluctantly, to affirm the trial court’s finding of fact that the childcare arrangement was not conducted for profit.

On this basis, I dissent in part from the majority opinion. In all other respects, I fully concur.

__________________________________________ HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams - Partial Dissent/Concurrence, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mid-century-insurance-company-v-virginia-williams--tennctapp-2005.