Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Federal Power Commission, Northern Natural Gas Company, Intervenor

D.C. Circuit

Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Federal Power Commission, Northern Natural Gas Company, Intervenor

299 F.2d 126, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 42, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 6088, 1962 WL 115928

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 26, 1962·No. 16694_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss, of intervenor’s memorandum in support, of petitioner’s response and of respondent’s reply, and it appearing that the issues petitioner attempts to raise in this petition for review may be raised in any review of the final order of the Commission in these proceedings, it is

ORDERED by the Court that this petition for review be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, would deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to its renewal at the hearing of this ease on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss, of intervenor’s memorandum in support, of petitioner’s response and of respondent’s reply, and it appearing that the issues petitioner attempts to raise in this petition for review may be raised in any review of the final order of the Commission in these proceedings, it is

ORDERED by the Court that this petition for review be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, would deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to its renewal at the hearing of this ease on the merits.

Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Federal Power Commission, Northern Natural Gas Company, Intervenor, 299 F.2d 126, 112 U.S. App. D.C. 42, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 6088, 1962 WL 115928 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Pincite

299 F.2d 126 (Mid-America Pipeline Company v. Federal Power Commission, Northern Natural Gas Company, Intervenor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.