Microwave Associates, Inc. v. Antenna Systems, Inc.

203 N.E.2d 807, 348 Mass. 783
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 N.E.2d 807 (Microwave Associates, Inc. v. Antenna Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Microwave Associates, Inc. v. Antenna Systems, Inc., 203 N.E.2d 807, 348 Mass. 783 (Mass. 1965).

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. In support of the plaintiff’s motion under Cr. L. c. 231, § 59 (as amended through St. 1955, c. 674, § 1), for immediate entry of judgment there was filed an instrument signed by one Both-well stating that he had been “duly sworn” and deposing to facts adequate to establish the plaintiff's ease. The instrument was attested by the certificate of a notary that Bothwell appeared and “stated that he ha[d] read the foregoing affidavit . . . and that the facts stated . . . are true to his own knowledge.” No counter affidavit was before the trial judge who allowed the motion. The instrument was a sufficient affidavit under § 59 and, read as a whole, adequately established that Bothwell had sworn to the truth of the facts stated. See Murphy, petitioner, 321 Mass. 206, 213; Carroll Hunnewell, Inc. v. Southboro Constr. Corp. 343 Mass. 667, 669. Cf. Cook Borden & Co. Inc. v. Commonwealth, 293 Mass. 174, 179-181 (jurat attached to mechanic’s lien claim not signed by notary public).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

27 West 15th Street, Inc. v. Hochreiter
50 Mass. App. Dec. 179 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.E.2d 807, 348 Mass. 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/microwave-associates-inc-v-antenna-systems-inc-mass-1965.