Micro-Magnetic Industries, Inc. v. Ardac, Inc.

488 F.2d 770, 179 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 715
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 1973
Docket72-2714
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 488 F.2d 770 (Micro-Magnetic Industries, Inc. v. Ardac, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micro-Magnetic Industries, Inc. v. Ardac, Inc., 488 F.2d 770, 179 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 715 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

SKOPIL, District Judge:

Appellee, Micro-Magnetic Industries, Inc., sued appellants, Ardac, Inc. and its subsidiaries, for infringement of United States Patent No. 2,964,641, referred to as the ‘Selgin II patent.

The suit upon the Selgin II invention was tried before the court which found that the Ardac machine infringed Claims 1, 4 and 5 of United States Patent No. 2,964,641. The court enjoined the defendants from infringing Claims 1, 4 and 5 without a license from Micro-Magnetic, and awarded damages for infringement based upon four percent of the price of Ardae’s machine. Ardac appeals from that judgment.

Having reviewed the record, we have concluded that the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly supported by the evidence. We agree with the trial judge’s opinion and affirm the case on the authority thereof. That opinion is reported at 372 F.Supp. 477 (D.C.1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 F.2d 770, 179 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micro-magnetic-industries-inc-v-ardac-inc-ca9-1973.