Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furn. Indus., Inc., 366 NC 371

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furn. Indus., Inc., 366 NC 371

DecidedJanuary 25, 2013

Docket294A12

StatusPublished

This text of Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furn. Indus., Inc., 366 NC 371 (Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furn. Indus., Inc., 366 NC 371) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furn. Indus., Inc., 366 NC 371, (N.C. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

MICRO CAPITAL INVESTORS, INC. v. BROYHILL FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. No. 294A12

(Filed 25 January 2013)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel

of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 728 S.E.2d 376 (2012), affirming an

order denying plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint entered on 24 January 2011 by

Judge Yvonne Mims Evans and an order granting summary judgment for defendant

entered on 28 January 2011 by Judge Edgar B. Gregory, both in Superior Court,

Caldwell County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 January 2013.

James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by John Parke Davis, Preston O. Odom, III, and Richard B. Fennell, for plaintiff-appellant.

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, by Susan Holdsclaw Boyles, Dustin T. Greene, and Katherine A. McCurry, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI