Micklethwait v. Commissioner

2 T.C.M. 223, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 262
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJune 8, 1943
DocketDocket Nos. 111351, 111485.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2 T.C.M. 223 (Micklethwait v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Micklethwait v. Commissioner, 2 T.C.M. 223, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 262 (tax 1943).

Opinion

Oscar R. Micklethwait and Laura A. Micklethwait, husband and wife v. Commissioner. Frank E. Wood v. Commissioner.
Micklethwait v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 111351, 111485.
United States Tax Court
1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 262; 2 T.C.M. (CCH) 223; T.C.M. (RIA) 43270;
June 8, 1943

*262 Held, certain distributions did not constitute liquidating dividends under section 115 of the Revenue Act of 1938.

Milton H. Schmidt, Esq., for the petitioners. Melvin S. Huffaker, Esq., for the respondent.

VAN FOSSAN

Memorandum Opinion

VAN FOSSAN, Judge: In Docket No. 111351, Oscar R. and Laura A. Micklethwait, the copy of the notice of deficiency attached to the petition shows that a deficiency in the amount of $437.62 was determined for the years 1938, 1939 and 1940. No copy of the statement which was attached to the notice of deficiency was submitted as part of the petition or at any time during the hearing. In their petition, the petitioners state that the taxes in controversy are for the calendar years 1938 and 1939 in amounts of approximately $50 and $330, respectively. In the Commissioner's answer it is admitted that the taxes in controversy are income taxes for the years 1938 and 1939 and alleged that they are in the respective amounts of $53.42 and $339.37. Neither in the stipulation of facts nor in the oral testimony were the correct amounts of the deficiencies in controversy or the method pursued in computing them admitted or established.

In Docket No. 111483, Frank*263 E. Wood, the same situation obtains. The copy of the notice of deficiency attached to the petition indicates a determination of deficiencies for the years 1938 and 1939 in the aggregate amount of $977.70. The petition states that the taxes in controversy were for the years 1938 and 1939 and in the respective amounts of $62 and $382. In his answer the Commissioner admits that the taxes in controversy are income taxes for the years 1938 and 1939 and alleges that the amounts in controversy are $138.95 and $838.75, respectively. Neither in the stipulation of facts nor in the supplementing oral testimony were the correct amounts of the deficiencies and the method of computation established.

Although these deficiencies in the record can be corrected in the computation under Rule 50 consequent on this opinion, their existence makes the consideration of the cases more difficult for the Court.

At the hearing the following stipulation of facts was filed:

[The Facts]

1. The petitioners, Oscar R. Micklethwait and Laura A. Micklethwait, husband and wife, are residents of the City of Portsmouth, State of Ohio, and the petitioner, Frank E. Wood, is a resident of the City of Cincinnati, *264 State of Ohio.

2. The petitioners filed income tax returns for the calendar years 1938 and 1939 with the Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio, at Cincinnati, Ohio.

3. The petitioners, throughout the years 1938 and 1939, were stockholders of Carrs Fork Coal Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Kentucky, with its mines in Kentucky and its offices in Portsmouth, Ohio.

4. On May 31, 1938, the Carrs Fork Coal Company paid to its stockholders a dividend in the amount of $19,180, this being equivalent to 5 per cent of the par value of the company's capital stock. Of this amount petitioners Oscar R. Micklethwait and Laura A. Micklethwait received the sum of $6,137.50, and petitioner Frank E. Wood received the sum of $1,525.

5. On December 23, 1939, the Carrs Fork Coal Company paid to its stockholders a dividend in the amount of $19,180, this being equivalent to 5 per cent of the par value of the company's capital stock. Of this amount petitioners Oscar R. Micklethwait and Laura A. Micklethwait received the sum of $6,137.50, and petitioner Frank E. Wood received the sum of $1,525.

6. The payments in both 1938 and 1939 were made pursuant*265 to resolutions duly adopted by the board of directors of the Carrs Fork Goal Company, the resolution in 1938 having been adopted on May 25, 1938, and the resolution in 1939 having been adopted June 1, 1939.

7. Net earnings and profits of the Carrs Fork Coal Company for the entire year 1938 were $2,370.74, and for the entire year 1939, were $19,810.89.

8. As of December 31, 1937, the Carrs Fork Coal Company had a deficit of not less than $18,182.46.

9. On the date of the dividend paid by the Carrs Fork Coal Company in the years 1938 and 1939, referred to in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, the Carrs Fork Coal Company had issued and outstanding 3,836 shares in 1938 and 3,829 shares in 1939, of its capital stock, of which 6,135 1/2 shares were owned of record by petitioners Oscar R. Micklethwait and Laura A. Micklethwait, and 305 shares were owned of record by petitioner Frank E. Wood. [This paragraph of the stipulation is unintelligible.]

The minutes of the meeting of the stockholders of the Carrs Fork Coal Company held May 4, 1938, read as follows:

The following action was taken and the following Resolution was adopted at the annual meeting of the stockholders of The Carrs Fork Coal *266 Company, held on May 4, 1938:

The Chairman next announced that since it is the opinion of our Directors that as our property becomes exhausted we should reduce our capital liability in proportion therewith, and since our engineers estimate that our property is now more than 25% depleted, it is recommended that a 5% liquidating dividend be paid at this time to all holders of the capital stock of the company, as of April 15, 1938, whereupon Mr. M. E. Dunn offered the following resolution which was seconded by Mr. A. O. Scott and unanimously carried:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BERETTA v. COMMISSIONER
1 T.C. 86 (U.S. Tax Court, 1942)
Wilcox v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 931 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 T.C.M. 223, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micklethwait-v-commissioner-tax-1943.