Micklege v. Capozzi
This text of 316 A.2d 887 (Micklege v. Capozzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, sustaining the preliminary objections of defendants Capozzi and 256, Inc., appellees, neither dismissed the complaint nor granted the plaintiffs leave to amend it.
We note also that the trial court made no finding as to the status of the judgment at law on the basis of which it sustained the preliminary objections nor as to the position of said judgment relative to the mortgage lien of defendant Overbrook Savings and Loan Association. (See Pa. R. C. P. 1028(c) : “If an issue of fact is raised, the court shall take evidence by deposition or otherwise.”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 A.2d 887, 455 Pa. 551, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/micklege-v-capozzi-pa-1974.