Mickle v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mickle v. State

300 S.E.2d 210, 165 Ga. App. 206, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3132

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 26, 1983

Docket65412

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 300 S.E.2d 210 (Mickle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mickle v. State, 300 S.E.2d 210, 165 Ga. App. 206, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3132 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Frank Theodore Mickle, III, was indicted for armed robbery. After a trial by a jury, he was found guilty of robbery by intimidation, a lesser included offense.

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion in this court requesting permission to withdraw and, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), filed a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. Pursuant to the rulings in Anders and Bethay, we conducted an extensive examination of the record and transcript filed in this case in order to determine if the appeal is, in fact, frivolous. On the basis of that review, we have granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and find that the requirements of Anders and Bethay have been met, that no reversible error appears in the record and that a rational trier of fact could have found from the evidence presented at trial that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Drayton v. State, 157 Ga. App. 872 (278 SE2d 758) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Frank Theodore Mickle, III, was indicted for armed robbery. After a trial by a jury, he was found guilty of robbery by intimidation, a lesser included offense.

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion in this court requesting permission to withdraw and, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967) and Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976), filed a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. Pursuant to the rulings in Anders and Bethay, we conducted an extensive examination of the record and transcript filed in this case in order to determine if the appeal is, in fact, frivolous. On the basis of that review, we have granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and find that the requirements of Anders and Bethay have been met, that no reversible error appears in the record and that a rational trier of fact could have found from the evidence presented at trial that the appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Drayton v. State, 157 Ga. App. 872 (278 SE2d 758) (1981).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 S.E.2d 210, 165 Ga. App. 206, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mickle-v-state-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack