Mickle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mickle v. State

741 So. 2d 645, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13209, 1999 WL 817814

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 6, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3170

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 741 So. 2d 645 (Mickle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mickle v. State, 741 So. 2d 645, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13209, 1999 WL 817814 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s sentences on the robbery charges. We reject all of appellant’s constitutional challenges to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Act, section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997). See Rollinson v. State, 743 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Scott v. State, 721 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Plain v. State, 720 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 909 (Fla.1999); Jesus v. State, 565 So.2d 1361, 1365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

We reverse appellant’s sentence of five years in prison on the charge of felony petit theft. As the state concedes, felony petit theft is not one of the enumerated offenses in section 775.082(8)(a)l.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI