Mickle v. Florida Baptist Assembly

Supreme Court of Florida

Mickle v. Florida Baptist Assembly

148 So. 178, 108 Fla. 372

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 23, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties', and the record having .been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court bé and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties', and the record having .been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court bé and the same is hereby affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Mickle v. Florida Baptist Assembly, 148 So. 178, 108 Fla. 372 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

148 So. 178 (Mickle v. Florida Baptist Assembly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.