Mickey S. Cox, Donald G. Cave and Huma-Clean LLC v. Nexbank SSB

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 11, 2013·No. 05-09-00822-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 11, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-09-00822-CV

MICKEY S. COX, DONALD G. CAVE, AND HUMA-CLEAN LLC, Appellants V. NEXBANK SSB, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 07-04434

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore We REINSTATE this appeal.

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties have

informed the Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant the parties’

motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

090822F.P05 S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MICKEY S. COX, DONALD G. CAVE, On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District AND, HUMA-CLEAN LLC, Appellants Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 07-04434. No. 05-09-00822-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. Justices O’Neill and Francis, participating. NEXBANK SSB, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered this 11th day of June, 2013.

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mickey S. Cox, Donald G. Cave and Huma-Clean LLC v. Nexbank SSB, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Mickey S. Cox, Donald G. Cave and Huma-Clean LLC v. Nexbank SSB (Mickey S. Cox, Donald G. Cave and Huma-Clean LLC v. Nexbank SSB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.