Mickey Bigg & Sons Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance
This text of 303 A.D.2d 566 (Mickey Bigg & Sons Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for services rendered, the defendants appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Term, 9th and 10th Judicial Districts, entered December 26, 2001, affirming a judgment of the City [567]*567Court, City of Newburgh, entered. September 12, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $12,685.22.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the oral promise of payment made by the defendant’s agent to the plaintiff was not barred by the statute of frauds. The promise represented an independent duty of payment, irrespective of the liability of the principal debtor, and was based upon new consideration (see Martin Roofing v Goldstein, 60 NY2d 262 [1983], cert denied 466 US 905 [1984]; Kramer v Harrington Wells & Rhodes, 275 AD2d 302 [2000]; Karl Ehmer Forest Hills Corp. v Gonzalez, 159 AD2d 613 [1990]).
The defendants’ remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
303 A.D.2d 566, 756 N.Y.S.2d 473, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mickey-bigg-sons-quality-auto-body-inc-v-allstate-insurance-nyappdiv-2003.