Mickens v. State
110 S.E. 623, 27 Ga. App. 581, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 280
This text of 110 S.E. 623 (Mickens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mickens v. State, 110 S.E. 623, 27 Ga. App. 581, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 280 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
The evidence relied upon for the conviction of the accused was wholly circumstantial and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It follows that his conviction was contrary to. law and the evidence and that the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harris v. State
168 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Dillard v. State
142 S.E. 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Williams v. State
129 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Gibbs v. State
113 S.E. 107 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 623, 27 Ga. App. 581, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mickens-v-state-gactapp-1921.