Mickens v. State

110 S.E. 623, 27 Ga. App. 581, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 280
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1921·No. 12612·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence relied upon for the conviction of the accused was wholly circumstantial and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It follows that his conviction was contrary to. law and the evidence and that the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mickens v. State, 110 S.E. 623, 27 Ga. App. 581, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 280 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

110 S.E. 623 (Mickens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
168 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Dillard v. State
142 S.E. 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Williams v. State
129 S.E. 111 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Gibbs v. State
113 S.E. 107 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)