Mickens v. State

985 So. 2d 681, 2008 WL 2596829
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2008·No. 4D08-2133·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

985 So.2d 681 (2008)

Gregory MICKENS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D08-2133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 2, 2008.

Gregory Mickens, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Mickens pled guilty to possession of cocaine, resisting an officer with violence, and possession of marijuana. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, he was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to twenty months in prison with credit for time served. He did not appeal the sentence, but now appeals the trial court's order denying his Rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction or modification of the sentence imposed pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement. He seeks reduction or modification of his sentence based on a recent United States Supreme Court decision scrutinizing the sentencing discrepancy between crack cocaine and powder cocaine offenses under the federal sentencing guidelines and holding that federal district courts can deviate from those guidelines in appropriate circumstances. See Kimbrough v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007).

Because trial court orders denying rule 3.800(c) motions to mitigate are not appealable, *682 we dismiss this appeal. See Williams v. State, 944 So.2d 549 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) and Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

POLEN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mickens v. State, 985 So. 2d 681, 2008 WL 2596829 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

985 So. 2d 681 (Mickens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RETCNICK FAUSTEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Ferguson v. State
994 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)