Mickens v. Albaugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mickens v. Albaugh

265 A.D.2d 878, 696 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9983

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 878 (Mickens v. Albaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mickens v. Albaugh, 265 A.D.2d 878, 696 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The misbehavior report, augmented by the testimony of its author, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated various inmate rules (see, Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642, 647; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). The contention of petitioner that the charges were brought against him in retaliation for grievances filed against the correction officer who signed the misbehavior report presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Bramble v Mead, 242 AD2d 858, 858-859, lv denied 91 NY2d 803). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The misbehavior report, augmented by the testimony of its author, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated various inmate rules (see, Matter of Bryant v Coughlin, 77 NY2d 642, 647; People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139). The contention of petitioner that the charges were brought against him in retaliation for grievances filed against the correction officer who signed the misbehavior report presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Bramble v Mead, 242 AD2d 858, 858-859, lv denied 91 NY2d 803). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 878, 696 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mickens-v-albaugh-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack