Mickel v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Mickel v. State

429 N.E.2d 423, 54 N.Y.2d 858, 444 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3077

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 1981

DocketClaim 60670

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 429 N.E.2d 423 (Mickel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mickel v. State, 429 N.E.2d 423, 54 N.Y.2d 858, 444 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court (77 AD2d 794). We note that claimant’s application for permission to file a late claim stating a cause of action for trespass arising out of the same transactions was denied. The issues presented on that application were not before the Appellate Division and are not now before us, and appellant now presses only a claim grounded in the theory of de facto appropriation. Accordingly, we do not reach the trespass issues.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court (77 AD2d 794). We note that claimant’s application for permission to file a late claim stating a cause of action for trespass arising out of the same transactions was denied. The issues presented on that application were not before the Appellate Division and are not now before us, and appellant now presses only a claim grounded in the theory of de facto appropriation. Accordingly, we do not reach the trespass issues.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 N.E.2d 423, 54 N.Y.2d 858, 444 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mickel-v-state-ny-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack