Mickel v. State

429 N.E.2d 423, 54 N.Y.2d 858, 444 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3077
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 1981·No. Claim 60670·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of that court (77 AD2d 794). We note that claimant’s application for permission to file a late claim stating a cause of action for trespass arising out of the same transactions was denied. The issues presented on that application were not before the Appellate Division and are not now before us, and appellant now presses only a claim grounded in the theory of de facto appropriation. Accordingly, we do not reach the trespass issues.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mickel v. State, 429 N.E.2d 423, 54 N.Y.2d 858, 444 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. 1981).

429 N.E.2d 423 (Mickel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.
77 A.D.3d 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Weaver v. Town of Rush
1 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Feder v. Village of Monroe
283 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gache v. Town of Harrison, NY
813 F. Supp. 1037 (S.D. New York, 1993)