Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
This text of 293 So. 2d 574 (Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This suit is consolidated with the suit of Lula Mae Harrell Cleveland, Individually and for the minors, Laverne Cleveland and Henry Cleveland v. Stanley B. Bordelon (No. 4468), 293 So.2d 574, and the suit of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insur[575]*575ance Company, et al. (No. 4470), 293 So.2d 568, which we have decided this day.
For the reasons assigned in the case of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insurance Company, et al. (No. 4470), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 So. 2d 574, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mickel-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-lactapp-1974.