Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

293 So. 2d 574, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4640
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 25, 1974·No. No. 4469·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

WATSON, Judge.

This suit is consolidated with the suit of Lula Mae Harrell Cleveland, Individually and for the minors, Laverne Cleveland and Henry Cleveland v. Stanley B. Bordelon (No. 4468), 293 So.2d 574, and the suit of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insur[575]*575ance Company, et al. (No. 4470), 293 So.2d 568, which we have decided this day.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insurance Company, et al. (No. 4470), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 293 So. 2d 574, 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4640 (La. Ct. App. 1974).

293 So. 2d 574 (Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland v. Bordelon
293 So. 2d 574 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)