Mick v. McCray

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mick v. McCray

489 S.W.3d 298, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 163

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 23, 2016

DocketWD 78585; WD 78586

StatusPublished

This text of 489 S.W.3d 298 (Mick v. McCray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mick v. McCray, 489 S.W.3d 298, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joseph and Laurie McCray appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of James Mick. Mick brought a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against Joseph arising out of Joseph’s management of a limited liability company and a derivative claim for faithless servant/breach of duty of loyalty against Joseph and Laurie alleging disloyal and dishonest actions as employees of the LLC. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Joseph and Laurie McCray appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of James Mick. Mick brought a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against Joseph arising out of Joseph’s management of a limited liability company and a derivative claim for faithless servant/breach of duty of loyalty against Joseph and Laurie alleging disloyal and dishonest actions as employees of the LLC. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 S.W.3d 298, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mick-v-mccray-moctapp-2016.