Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert

227 So. 2d 615, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5934

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 8, 1969

DocketNo. 2789

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 227 So. 2d 615 (Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Co. v. Hebert, 227 So. 2d 615, 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5934 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Eula Mae Fruge, La. App. 227 So.2d 606, the judgment appealed is amended to (1) reduce the award to Elroy Hebert to $4,561.00 and (2) delete the limitations on the servitude designated as G-l through G^6. Except for these amendments, the judgment is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Affirmed, as amended.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Before TATE, FRUGE, SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEPPER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned in the per curiam denial of defendant’s application for a rehearing in the companion case, Michigan-Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Eula Mae Fruge, 227 So.2d 606, our original decision herein is amended to increase the award to Elroy Hebert to $4795 and the application for rehearing is denied.

TATE, J., dissents.

The reasons assigned in No. 2788 (Frugé), 227 So.2d 606.

FRUGÉ, J., votes for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI