MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. v. City of Detroit

721 N.W.2d 583, 477 Mich. 873, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2084
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 27, 2006·No. 130548·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

721 N.W.2d 583 (2006)

MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC., and Dr. James Nikolovski, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130548. COA No. 263837.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WEAVER, J., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. v. City of Detroit, 721 N.W.2d 583, 477 Mich. 873, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2084 (Mich. 2006).

721 N.W.2d 583 (MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brzozowski v. WONDRASEK
721 N.W.2d 583 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)