MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. v. City of Detroit
721 N.W.2d 583, 477 Mich. 873, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2084
This text of 721 N.W.2d 583 (MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC. v. City of Detroit, 721 N.W.2d 583, 477 Mich. 873, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2084 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
MICHIGAN REHABILITATION CLINIC, INC., and Dr. James Nikolovski, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
WEAVER, J., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brzozowski v. WONDRASEK
721 N.W.2d 583 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
721 N.W.2d 583, 477 Mich. 873, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-rehabilitation-clinic-inc-v-city-of-detroit-mich-2006.