Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Kelly
140 A.D.2d 593, 528 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 23, 1988
StatusPublished
This text of 140 A.D.2d 593 (Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Michigan Mutual Insurance v. Kelly, 140 A.D.2d 593, 528 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
[594]*594There are questions of fact apparent as to how much money was paid to the insurance broker and how much was paid by the broker to the plaintiff regarding the subject policy. Where questions of fact exist a motion for summary judgment must be denied (CPLR 3212 [b]). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 593, 528 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-mutual-insurance-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1988.