Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Lanasa

Supreme Court of Virginia

Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Lanasa

118 S.E.2d 455, 202 Va. 570, 1961 Va. LEXIS 145

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedMarch 6, 1961

DocketRecord No. 5186

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E.2d 455 (Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Lanasa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Lanasa, 118 S.E.2d 455, 202 Va. 570, 1961 Va. LEXIS 145 (Va. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Spratley, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

[571]*571This is a companion case to Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mrs. Giuseppa Lanasa, this day decided, ante page 562. By agreement of counsel and with the consent of the court, both cases were heard in the trial court at the same time. The testimony, the exhibits, and the incidents of trial are equally applicable in both cases. Judgment was rendered in favor of Mrs. Lanasa. Upon appeal from that judgment, the case has been submitted to us for determination upon the same record and briefs filed in the companion case.

Upon consideration whereof, and for the reasons stated in Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mrs. Giuseppa Lanasa, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spratley, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

[571]*571This is a companion case to Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mrs. Giuseppa Lanasa, this day decided, ante page 562. By agreement of counsel and with the consent of the court, both cases were heard in the trial court at the same time. The testimony, the exhibits, and the incidents of trial are equally applicable in both cases. Judgment was rendered in favor of Mrs. Lanasa. Upon appeal from that judgment, the case has been submitted to us for determination upon the same record and briefs filed in the companion case.

Upon consideration whereof, and for the reasons stated in Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Mrs. Giuseppa Lanasa, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in this case.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E.2d 455, 202 Va. 570, 1961 Va. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-millers-mutual-insurance-v-lanasa-va-1961.