Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company
This text of Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company (Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 8, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160448 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra MICHIGAN HEAD & SPINE INSTITUTE, PC, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement and Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
BEAUMONT HEALTH and KUANDA BEY, Intervening Plaintiffs, v SC: 160448 COA: 345916 Wayne CC: 16-012678-NF GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 17, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 8, 2020 t0831 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-head-spine-institute-pc-v-geico-indemnity-company-mich-2020.