Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company
This text of Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company (Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 26, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 160448(36) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra MICHIGAN HEAD & SPINE INSTITUTE, PC, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth T. Clement and Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
BEAUMONT HEALTH and KUANDA BEY, Intervening Plaintiffs, SC: 160448 v COA: 345916 Wayne CC: 16-012678-NF GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. _________________________________________/
On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on December 23, 2019, is accepted as timely filed.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 26, 2019
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-head-spine-institute-pc-v-geico-indemnity-company-mich-2019.