Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company
This text of Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company (Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
July 6, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 157289(50)(51) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, MICHIGAN HEAD & SPINE Justices INSTITUTE, P.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, and BEAUMONT HEALTH and KUANDA BEY, Intervening Plaintiffs, v SC: 157289 COA: 340273 Wayne CC: 16-012678-NF GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.
____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 29, 2018 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 6, 2018 s0703 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Geico Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-head-spine-institute-pc-v-geico-indemnity-company-mich-2018.