Michigan Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Burnside v. Fashion Bug of Detroit

705 N.W.2d 342, 474 Mich. 915, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2215
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 3, 2005·No. 126254·Published

Opinion

705 N.W.2d 342 (2005)
474 Mich. 915

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS ex rel Burnette BURNSIDE, Claimant-Appellee,
v.
FASHION BUG OF DETROIT, Respondent-Appellant.

Docket No. 126254. COA No. 240325.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 3, 2005.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of July 21, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant reconsideration. On reconsideration, I would deny leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent to the order reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

WEAVER J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant reconsideration. On reconsideration, I would deny leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent to the order reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case. 473 Mich. 863, 874, 702 N.W.2d 154 (2005) (WEAVER, J. dissenting).

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant reconsideration. On reconsideration, I would deny leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent of July 21, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michigan Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Burnside v. Fashion Bug of Detroit, 705 N.W.2d 342, 474 Mich. 915, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2215 (Mich. 2005).

705 N.W.2d 342 (Michigan Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Burnside v. Fashion Bug of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DEPT. OF CIVIL RIGHTS EX REL. BURNSIDE v. Fashion Bug of Detroit
702 N.W.2d 154 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2005)