Michigan Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Burnside v. Fashion Bug of Detroit
This text of 705 N.W.2d 342 (Michigan Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Burnside v. Fashion Bug of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS ex rel Burnette BURNSIDE, Claimant-Appellee,
v.
FASHION BUG OF DETROIT, Respondent-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of July 21, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant reconsideration. On reconsideration, I would deny leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent to the order reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
WEAVER J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant reconsideration. On reconsideration, I would deny leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent to the order reversing the judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case. 473 Mich. 863, 874, 702 N.W.2d 154 (2005) (WEAVER, J. dissenting).
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would grant reconsideration. On reconsideration, I would deny leave to appeal for the reasons stated in my dissent of July 21, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
705 N.W.2d 342, 474 Mich. 915, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-department-of-civil-rights-ex-rel-burnside-v-fashion-bug-of-mich-2005.