Michigan Comprehensive Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secretary of St
This text of Michigan Comprehensive Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secretary of St (Michigan Comprehensive Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secretary of St) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
September 7, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
154359 & (4)(5) Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein MICHIGAN COMPREHENSIVE CANNABIS Joan L. Larsen, LAW REFORM COMMITTEE, a/k/a Justices MILEGALIZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 154359 COA: 334560 Ct of Claims: 16-000131-MM SECRETARY OF STATE, BUREAU OF ELECTIONS, and BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, Defendants-Appellees.
____________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is treated as an application for leave to appeal the September 7, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals. The application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for consolidation is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 7, 2016 p0906 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michigan Comprehensive Cannabis Law Reform Comm v. Secretary of St, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-comprehensive-cannabis-law-reform-comm-v-secretary-of-st-mich-2016.