Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of Michigan

DecidedJanuary 29, 2014

Docket147758

StatusPublished

This text of Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of Michigan (Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of Michigan, (Mich. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147758 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack MICHIGAN COALITION OF STATE David F. Viviano, EMPLOYEE UNIONS, INTERNATIONAL Justices UNION UAW AND LOCAL 6000, MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION/SEIU, MICHIGAN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES/SEIU LOCAL 517M, MICHIGAN STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME LOCAL 5, MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25, ANTHONY MCNEILL, RAY HOLMAN, ANDREW POTTER, ED CLEMENTS, AMY LIPSET, WILLIAM RUHF, KENNETH MOORE, RUSSELL WATERS, MARK MOZDZEN, and KATHLEEN WINE/ ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 147758 COA: 314048 Court of Claims: 12-000017-MM STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, DEPARTMENT/DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, DIRECTOR OF RETIREMENT SERVICES OFFICE, and STATE TREASURER, Defendants-Appellants.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether 2011 PA 264 is unconstitutional, in whole or in part, in violation of Const 1963, art 11, § 5. 2

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in UAW v Green (Docket No. 147700).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 29, 2014 h0122 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

147758 Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack MICHIGAN COALITION OF STATE David F. Viviano, EMPLOYEE UNIONS, INTERNATIONAL Justices UNION UAW AND LOCAL 6000, MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS ORGANIZATION/SEIU, MICHIGAN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES/SEIU LOCAL 517M, MICHIGAN STATE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, AFSCME LOCAL 5, MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25, ANTHONY MCNEILL, RAY HOLMAN, ANDREW POTTER, ED CLEMENTS, AMY LIPSET, WILLIAM RUHF, KENNETH MOORE, RUSSELL WATERS, MARK MOZDZEN, and KATHLEEN WINE/ ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v SC: 147758 COA: 314048 Court of Claims: 12-000017-MM STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, DEPARTMENT/DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, DIRECTOR OF RETIREMENT SERVICES OFFICE, and STATE TREASURER, Defendants-Appellants.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether 2011 PA 264 is unconstitutional, in whole or in part, in violation of Const 1963, art 11, § 5. 2

We direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same future session of this Court when it will hear oral argument in UAW v Green (Docket No. 147700).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 29, 2014 h0122 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Michigan Coalition of State Employee Unions v. State of Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-coalition-of-state-employee-unions-v-stat-mich-2014.