Michigan Campaign for New Drug Policies v. BD. OF STATE CANVASSERS

650 N.W.2d 327, 467 Mich. 869
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2002
Docket122283
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 650 N.W.2d 327 (Michigan Campaign for New Drug Policies v. BD. OF STATE CANVASSERS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michigan Campaign for New Drug Policies v. BD. OF STATE CANVASSERS, 650 N.W.2d 327, 467 Mich. 869 (Mich. 2002).

Opinion

650 N.W.2d 327 (2002)

MICHIGAN CAMPAIGN FOR NEW DRUG POLICIES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF STATE CANVASSERS, and Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees, and
Committee to Protect our Kids, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 122283.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 10, 2002.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal from the September 6, 2002, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

KELLY, J., concurring:

I concur. But for the time constraints governing this matter, I would grant leave to consider whether this Court possesses the authority to order correction of the technical error that prevents this proposal from appearing on the ballot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. Bell
387 F. Supp. 2d 728 (E.D. Michigan, 2005)
Rednour v. Hastings Mutual Insurance
661 N.W.2d 562 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2003)
Frazzini v. TOTAL PETROLEUM INC.
650 N.W.2d 327 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
650 N.W.2d 327, 467 Mich. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-campaign-for-new-drug-policies-v-bd-of-state-canvassers-mich-2002.