Michigan Buggy Co. v. Camden Wagon & Sleigh Co.
119 A.D. 917, 105 N.Y.S. 1131
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1907
StatusPublished
This text of 119 A.D. 917 (Michigan Buggy Co. v. Camden Wagon & Sleigh Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Michigan Buggy Co. v. Camden Wagon & Sleigh Co., 119 A.D. 917, 105 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. Held, that while the evidence specified in the order was competent the. order should be affirmed for other errors in the reception of evidence. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
119 A.D. 917, 105 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-buggy-co-v-camden-wagon-sleigh-co-nyappdiv-1907.