Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Suddeth

Sixth Circuit

Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Suddeth

172 F.2d 223

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 17, 1949

DocketNo. 10719

StatusPublished

This text of 172 F.2d 223 (Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Suddeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Suddeth, 172 F.2d 223 (6th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of record, briefs and argument of counsel, and the court being of the opinion that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and that therefore the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto, and it further appearing that there is no reversible error upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged-that the judgment appealed from, entered by the District Court on January 23, 1948, be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of record, briefs and argument of counsel, and the court being of the opinion that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and that therefore the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto, and it further appearing that there is no reversible error upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged-that the judgment appealed from, entered by the District Court on January 23, 1948, be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 F.2d 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-bell-telephone-co-v-suddeth-ca6-1949.