Michigan Afscme Council 25 v. County of Wayne

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 9, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

141667 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly ROSEMARY BUTLER, NORA RAYMOND, Brian K. Zahra, and FLORENCE GLOVER, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants, and MICHIGAN AFSCME COUNCIL 25, and its LOCALS 25, 101, 409 and 1659, Plaintiffs, v SC: 141667 COA: 290361 Wayne CC: 07-710478-CL WAYNE COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY RETIREMENT BOARD, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH and MARILYN KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

HATHAWAY, J., states as follows:

I am not participating in this matter because I have a vested financial interest in defendant Wayne County’s pension system, which is the subject matter of this litigation. See MCR 2.003(C)(1)(f).

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 9, 2011 _________________________________________ p0302 Clerk