Michenor v. Reinach

21 So. 552, 49 La. Ann. 360, 1896 La. LEXIS 724
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 30, 1896
DocketNo. 12,302
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 21 So. 552 (Michenor v. Reinach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michenor v. Reinach, 21 So. 552, 49 La. Ann. 360, 1896 La. LEXIS 724 (La. 1896).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

The motion has been made to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the bond furnished by the appellant is in amount insufficient for a suspensive appeal; it not being for one-half over and above the amount of the judgment appealed from.

Under the rules governing appeals the motion, as stated, presents the only ground for decision in this case.

It is true that the amount of the bond is less than is required bylaw for a suspensive appeal.

The amount of the bond is that fixed by the judge a quo.

While it is not sufficient for a suspensive appeal, it is sufficient for a devolutive appeal.

This was the decision, upon this point, in a number of cases before this court. Succession of Keller, 89 An. 580, and authorities cited.

The present appeal should be sustained in so far as it is devolutive.

To that extent the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Courvelle v. Eckart
49 So. 2d 658 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1950)
Graziani v. Elder & Walters Equipment Co.
22 So. 2d 841 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1945)
Price v. Louisiana Rural Rehabilitation Corp.
134 F.2d 548 (Fifth Circuit, 1943)
Price v. Louisiana Rural Rehabilitation Corp.
38 F. Supp. 196 (W.D. Louisiana, 1941)
Roberts v. Medlock
148 So. 474 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
Watson v. Schmidt
135 So. 232 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)
Lewis v. Provenzano
5 La. App. 101 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1923)
Pan-American Bank & Trust Co. v. Ransom
90 So. 548 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1921)
Brinkman v. Succession of Posey
79 So. 540 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
Whelan v. Rossiter
82 P. 1082 (California Court of Appeal, 1905)
Knoll v. Knoll
38 So. 523 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)
Succession of Watt
36 So. 31 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 So. 552, 49 La. Ann. 360, 1896 La. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michenor-v-reinach-la-1896.