Michenor v. Kinney

Ohio Supreme Court

Michenor v. Kinney

1 Wright 459, 1 Ohio Ch. 459

DecidedOctober 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 459 (Michenor v. Kinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michenor v. Kinney, 1 Wright 459, 1 Ohio Ch. 459 (Ohio 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The case of Howe v. Dawson, Tappan, 169, decides the precise point before us; and it is said, the same point has been repeatedly decided by this court, though we have no reported case. Suppose there was a seal of wax instead of a scrawl, would not the instrument be sealed ? Our law puts the scrawl upon the same footing as the wax seal.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

[Note with scrawl is sealed note, followed; Osborn v. Kistler, 35 O. S. 90, 101.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

The case of Howe v. Dawson, Tappan, 169, decides the precise point before us; and it is said, the same point has been repeatedly decided by this court, though we have no reported case. Suppose there was a seal of wax instead of a scrawl, would not the instrument be sealed ? Our law puts the scrawl upon the same footing as the wax seal.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

[Note with scrawl is sealed note, followed; Osborn v. Kistler, 35 O. S. 90, 101.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 459, 1 Ohio Ch. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michenor-v-kinney-ohio-1833.