Michener v. Michener
2 A. 508, 1 Sadler 391, 17 Week. No. 266, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 574
This text of 2 A. 508 (Michener v. Michener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Michener v. Michener, 2 A. 508, 1 Sadler 391, 17 Week. No. 266, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 574 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
There was no error in rejecting the evidence. It was wholly insufficient to rebut the presumption of payment. It indicates a desire to have the mortgage satisfied of record, but not an admission that it was unpaid. We discover no error in the charge, nor in directing the jury to render a verdict in favor of the defendants. The other specifications of error have no merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nichols v. McCall
13 La. Ann. 215 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1858)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 A. 508, 1 Sadler 391, 17 Week. No. 266, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michener-v-michener-pa-1886.