Michener v. Michener

2 A. 508, 1 Sadler 391, 17 Week. No. 266, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 574

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no error in rejecting the evidence. It was wholly insufficient to rebut the presumption of payment. It indicates a desire to have the mortgage satisfied of record, but not an admission that it was unpaid. We discover no error in the charge, nor in directing the jury to render a verdict in favor of the defendants. The other specifications of error have no merit.

Judgment affirmed.