Michener v. Fransham
This text of 66 P. 1087 (Michener v. Fransham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered tbe opinion of the court.
Bor tlie reason set out in the opinion this day filed in the case of W. A. Jordan et al. v. W. W. Andrus et al. (ante page 37, 66 Pac. 502), tlm motion to dismiss this appeal, upon the ground that the transcript is not printed as it should have bee.n in Accordance with Rule YI, is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without prejudice to a motion to reinstate if appellant shall prepare, file and serve a printed transcript in accordance with the requirements of Rules YI and IX of this court, within sixty days from this date.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 P. 1087, 26 Mont. 44, 1901 Mont. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michener-v-fransham-mont-1901.