Michelson v. Michelson

136 N.Y.S. 533, 3 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R., (N.S.) 5
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 1912·Published

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

Although the defendant has not appeared in opposition to the motion for alimony and counsel fee, I am compelled by reason of the insufficiency of the moving affidavit to deny the same. The action is for a divorce,- and the plaintiff alone has made an affidavit as to the defendant’s adultery. Her evidence, however, is not competent to prove the adultery. Moriarty v. Moriarty, 10 N. Y. Supp. 228; Wood v. Wood, 61 App. Div. 96, 70 N. Y. Supp. 72. The wife, in order to obtain either alimony or counsel fee, must present a case to the court showing that she has a fair prospect of success in the action. Collins v. Collins, 71 N. Y. 269, 275; Moriarty v. Moriarty, supra. Since this has not been shown, the motion must be denied, without costs, with leave to renew on sufficient papers.

Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michelson v. Michelson, 136 N.Y.S. 533, 3 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R., (N.S.) 5 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1912).

136 N.Y.S. 533 (Michelson v. Michelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. . Collins
71 N.Y. 269 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Wood v. Wood
61 A.D. 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Moriarty v. Moriarty
10 N.Y.S. 228 (Superior Court of New York, 1890)