Michelson v. Clyne

84 A.D.2d 883, 444 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16137
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, for judgment in the nature of prohibition granted, without costs. A superior court Judge, even when sitting as a local criminal court, has no trial jurisdiction of a violation (CPL 10.30, subd 3). A superior court Judge is limited to preliminary jurisdiction in such a situation (CPL 10.20, subd 2). In our view, a suppression hearing falls within the term trial jurisdiction (see CPL 1.20, subds 24, 25; cf. CPL 170.15, 710.50) which, in the case of a violation, is lodged exclusively in the local criminal court (CPL 10.30, subd 1, par [a]). Therefore, the respondent County Court Judge is without jurisdiction to preside at the hearing to be held on petitioners’ motion to suppress. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michelson v. Clyne, 84 A.D.2d 883, 444 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

84 A.D.2d 883 (Michelson v. Clyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Correa
933 N.E.2d 705 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Kay
125 Misc. 2d 833 (Amherst Town Court, 1984)