Michelsen v. Ryle
This text of 284 A.D. 892 (Michelsen v. Ryle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for breach of a construction contract and for extra services, order denying appellant’s motion, under subdivision 5 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the second counterclaim as insufficient in law, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Murphy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 892, 134 N.Y.S.2d 595, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelsen-v-ryle-nyappdiv-1954.