Michelovitch v. Arter
This text of 156 A. 684 (Michelovitch v. Arter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action of the case for trover and conversion was heard by a justice of the Superior Court who rendered decision for the plaintiff for $500. The case is before this court on the defendant’s exceptions to this decision. The only exception urged is the one to the amount of the damages.
The action is brought to recover the value of an automobile. which, the defendant took possession of and sold July 24, 1929. March 21, 1930, defendant refused to deliver possession of the automobile to the plaintiff in response to his demand therefor. Defendant concedes that plaintiff proved his right to the possession of the automobile.
Defendant claims that the measure of damages is the value of the automobile at the time plaintiff demanded possession of it. This claim is not tenable. We have held that the measure of damages of a converted chattel is its value at the time of its conversion. Woods v. Nichols, 21 R. I. 537. Defendant testified that at the time he sold the automobile it was worth between $450 and $500. This testimony is sufficient to support the amount awarded by the trial justice.
All of the defendant’s exceptions are overruled and the case is remitted to the Superior Court for the entry of judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A. 684, 52 R.I. 38, 1931 R.I. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelovitch-v-arter-ri-1931.