Michelle Spence v. Mac Coalson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 31, 2011·No. 02-10-00382-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-382-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00382-CV

Michelle Spence

APPELLANT

V.

Mac Coalson

APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 415th District Court OF Parker COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

On August 1, 2011, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GARDNER, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  August 31, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michelle Spence v. Mac Coalson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Michelle Spence v. Mac Coalson (Michelle Spence v. Mac Coalson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.