Michelle Shelly Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse and Lauren Price Laroche and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC
Opinion
Opinion issued May 30, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
interlocutory order granting summary judgment.1 In their motion, appellants state
that the trial court issued an order on April 29, 2024 denying appellants’ motion for
permission to pursue an interlocutory appeal. More than ten days have elapsed since
the filing of appellants’ motion to dismiss, and no party has objected to dismissal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the
appeal. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
1 See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(d) (authorizing trial court to permit interlocutory appeal from otherwise unappealable interlocutory order under certain circumstances), (f) (authorizing appeals court to accept interlocutory appeal permitted by trial court and requiring appealing party to petition appellate court for permission); TEX. R. CIV. P. 168 (governing procedure for trial court’s granting permission to appeal); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3 (governing procedure for filing petition for permissive appeal with appellate court when trial court has permitted appeal from interlocutory order).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michelle Shelly Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse and Lauren Price Laroche and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC (Michelle Shelly Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse and Lauren Price Laroche and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.