Michelle Rae Chavez v. the State of Texas
This text of Michelle Rae Chavez v. the State of Texas (Michelle Rae Chavez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00221-CR No. 07-24-00222-CR
MICHELLE RAE CHAVEZ, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 181st District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 080493-B-CR, 080065-B-CR, Honorable Titiana Frausto, Presiding
January 14, 2025 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Michelle Rae Chavez, appeals her convictions for intoxication assault1
and intoxication manslaughter2 and consecutive sentences to ten years of confinement.
Appellant’s brief was originally due September 19, 2024, but we granted Appellant’s
appointed counsel three extensions to file a brief. By letter of November 20, 2024, we
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.07(c).
2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 49.08(b). admonished Appellant’s counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that
failure to file a brief by December 20 would result in the appeal being abated and the
cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice.
Appellant’s counsel has since filed two additional requests for an extension of time to file
a brief, with his latest motion requesting until January 9, 2025. However, no brief has
been filed to date.
Accordingly, we deny Appellant’s third and fourth motion for extension as moot,
abate the appeals, and remand the causes to the trial court for further proceedings. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeals;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
4. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeals;
5. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
6. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
7. if Appellant desires to continue the appeals, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by February 13,
2025. If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeals, is indigent,
and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new
2 counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any
newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before January 28, 2025, he is directed
to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall
not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michelle Rae Chavez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelle-rae-chavez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.