Michelle Nino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Nino, Julyssa Sixx Nino Robert Nino Jr. And Alyssa Nikki Nino v. Primoris Energy Services Corporation D/B/A Primoris Pipeline

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 3, 2019
Docket04-18-00758-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michelle Nino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Nino, Julyssa Sixx Nino Robert Nino Jr. And Alyssa Nikki Nino v. Primoris Energy Services Corporation D/B/A Primoris Pipeline (Michelle Nino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Nino, Julyssa Sixx Nino Robert Nino Jr. And Alyssa Nikki Nino v. Primoris Energy Services Corporation D/B/A Primoris Pipeline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michelle Nino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Nino, Julyssa Sixx Nino Robert Nino Jr. And Alyssa Nikki Nino v. Primoris Energy Services Corporation D/B/A Primoris Pipeline, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 3, 2019

No. 04-18-00758-CV

Michelle NINO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Nino, Deceased; Julyssa Sixx Nino; Robert Nino Jr.; and Alyssa Nikki Nino, Appellants

v.

PRIMORIS ENERGY SERVICES CORPORATION D/B/A Primoris Pipeline, Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Dimmit County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-12-12787-DCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellants’ brief was originally due November 30, 2018; however, the court granted an extension of time until December 31. Appellants have filed a motion asking for an additional thirty day extension of time to file the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellants’ brief due January 30, 2019. The court does not ordinarily grant extensions of more than sixty days beyond the original due date. Counsel is therefore advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed before the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of January, 2019.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michelle Nino, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Nino, Julyssa Sixx Nino Robert Nino Jr. And Alyssa Nikki Nino v. Primoris Energy Services Corporation D/B/A Primoris Pipeline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelle-nino-individually-and-as-personal-representative-of-the-estate-of-texapp-2019.