Michelle Feeney v. Agave Assets LLC, Jojoba Assets LLC
This text of Michelle Feeney v. Agave Assets LLC, Jojoba Assets LLC (Michelle Feeney v. Agave Assets LLC, Jojoba Assets LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00392-CV ___________________________
MICHELLE FEENEY, Appellant
V.
AGAVE ASSETS LLC AND JOJOBA ASSETS LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-006170-1
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On April 13, 2022, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as the
appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the
court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 19, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michelle Feeney v. Agave Assets LLC, Jojoba Assets LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelle-feeney-v-agave-assets-llc-jojoba-assets-llc-texapp-2022.