MICHELLE D. LANDIN v. MARILYN MAGINLEY
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
MICHELLE D. LANDIN,
Appellant,
v.
MARILYN MAGINLEY, DANIA PERRY, JIM WHITE & ASSOCIATES, INC. D/B/A CENTURY 21 JIM WHITE AND ASSOCIATES, INC., and JAMES R. WHITE, JR.,
Appellees.
No. 2D22-2349
March 8, 2024
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Cynthia J. Newton, Judge.
Carroll G. Sanders of CGS Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.
Ryan M. Schmidt of Coats Schmidt, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee Marilyn Maginley.
Lori A. Heim of Bush Ross, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees Dania Perry, Jim White & Associates, Inc. D/B/A Century 21 Jim White and Associates, and James R. White, Jr.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MICHELLE D. LANDIN v. MARILYN MAGINLEY (MICHELLE D. LANDIN v. MARILYN MAGINLEY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.