Michelle Chase v. State
This text of Michelle Chase v. State (Michelle Chase v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 7, 2018
No. 04-17-00834-CR
Michelle CHASE, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR4377 Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file her brief and a motion for the trial court clerk to supplement the clerk’s record. Appellant contends the clerk’s record is incomplete because it does not include all exhibits admitted into evidence at trial. However, it is the court reporter, not the trial court clerk, who files the exhibits admitted at trial, and the court reporter in this appeal has filed the exhibits admitted at trial. Therefore, appellant’s motion to supplement the clerk’s record is DENIED. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. We ORDER appellant to file her brief on or before September 4, 2018.
_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of August, 2018. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michelle Chase v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelle-chase-v-state-texapp-2018.