Michelin Tire Corp. v. Lindley

376 N.E.2d 592, 54 Ohio St. 2d 313, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 301, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 561
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 1978
DocketNo. 77-1218
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 376 N.E.2d 592 (Michelin Tire Corp. v. Lindley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michelin Tire Corp. v. Lindley, 376 N.E.2d 592, 54 Ohio St. 2d 313, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 301, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 561 (Ohio 1978).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause centers on the import-export clause, Section 10, Article I of the United States Constitution which provides, in part, that: “No state shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws * * *.”

In Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages (1976), 423 U. S. 276, the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a Georgia ad valorem property tax with regard to imported tires and tubes, and specifically overruled its decision in Low v. [314]*314Austin (1872), 13 Wall. 29, which had held that the states were prohibited by the import-export clause from imposing a nondiscriminatory ad valorem property tax on imported goods, until the goods lost their character as imports and became incorporated into thé general mass of property in the state.

Justice Brennan, speaking for seven members of the court, stated, in Michelin, supra, at page 283:

“Our independent study persuades us that a nondiscriminatory ad valorem property tax is not the type of state exaction which the Framers of the Constitution or the Court in Brown [v. Maryland (1872), 12 Wheat. 419], had in mind as being an impost’ or duty’ and that Low Austin’s reliance upon the Brown dictum to reach the contrary conclusion was misplaced.” .

The decision of the board is neither unreasonable nor unlawful, and it is therefore affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbbert, Celebrezze, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Harris
2020 Ohio 5425 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Mascaro
610 N.E.2d 1031 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 N.E.2d 592, 54 Ohio St. 2d 313, 8 Ohio Op. 3d 301, 1978 Ohio LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michelin-tire-corp-v-lindley-ohio-1978.