Michele Black v. County of Montgomery

Third Circuit

Michele Black v. County of Montgomery

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 2016

Docket15-3399

StatusPublished

This text of Michele Black v. County of Montgomery (Michele Black v. County of Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michele Black v. County of Montgomery, (3d Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 15-3399 ____________

MICHELE OWEN BLACK, Appellant

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY; DET. JOHN T. FALLON; LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP; DET. GREGORY HENRY; BRYAN GARNER; CHIEF FIRE OFF. CHARLES MCGARVEY; DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL FRANK HAND; STATE TROOPER ROBERT POMPONIO ____________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa. No. 2-14-cv-06702) District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody ____________

Argued on June 8, 2016

Before: CHAGARES, KRAUSE, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed August 30, 2016 is hereby amended to correct a typographical error in that the word “not” was omitted from the sentence appearing at pages 12-13 of the opinion. The sentence as corrected should read: We noted that unlike the “significant pretrial restrictions” imposed in Gallo, the plaintiffs’ liberty in DiBella was restricted only during their municipal court trial and that merely attending trial does not amount to a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. Id.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: September 16, 2016 CJG/JK/cc: All Counsel of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 15-3399 ____________

MICHELE OWEN BLACK, Appellant

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY; DET. JOHN T. FALLON; LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP; DET. GREGORY HENRY; BRYAN GARNER; CHIEF FIRE OFF. CHARLES MCGARVEY; DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL FRANK HAND; STATE TROOPER ROBERT POMPONIO ____________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa. No. 2-14-cv-06702) District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody ____________

Argued on June 8, 2016

Before: CHAGARES, KRAUSE, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed August 30, 2016 is hereby amended to correct a typographical error in that the word “not” was omitted from the sentence appearing at pages 12-13 of the opinion. The sentence as corrected should read: We noted that unlike the “significant pretrial restrictions” imposed in Gallo, the plaintiffs’ liberty in DiBella was restricted only during their municipal court trial and that merely attending trial does not amount to a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes. Id.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: September 16, 2016 CJG/JK/cc: All Counsel of Record

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Michele Black v. County of Montgomery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michele-black-v-county-of-montgomery-ca3-2016.